|
|
published by
|
|
Letter to the Editor
Antioxidants - friend or foe?
Hans Meffert - Dermatologisches Zentrum, Berlin, Germany
GMS Ger Med Sci 2008;6:Doc09
© 2008 Meffert.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
|
|
Text
Particularly in the field of advertising and in popular scientific journals, antioxidants such as β-carotene (from carrots) or lycopenes (from tomatoes) and the
However, free radicals should by no means be considered as being exclusively destructive. On the contrary, processes such as energy metabolism (in the respiratory chain) and the defence of neutrophilic granulocytes against pathogens and foreign bodies depend on the formation of free radicals [1], [2].
For this reason alone, it has to be expected that a supply of antioxidants may also cause considerable undesired effects to the skin and the organism.
In addition, “under certain conditions, some anti-oxidants can also exhibit a pro-oxidant mechanism of action” [3], e.g. β-carotene [3] or vitamin C [4], with the question “When is an antioxidant not an antioxidant?” [4].
Many people with above-average consumption of fruits and vegetables undoubtedly demonstrate a lower risk of developing lung cancer. However about 10 years ago, completely unexpectedly two studies on highly dosed β
In a large-scale, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on prevention, 864 persons, whose colon polyps had been removed, received 25 mg of
Further clinical studies showed that β-carotene supplementation caused no change in the incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer. As H. S. Black reported, after a β-carotene supplemented diet even a significant exacerbation of the UV-carcinogenesis occurred. A photoprotective effect was not achieved [7].
The artificial supply of antioxidants into the human skin poses further questions. In everyday life, on holidays or at work, large amounts of optical radiation can penetrate into the skin and modify the effects of antioxidants. It has been known for a long time that large quantities of free radicals can be generated in human skin as a result of UV irradiation [8], [9].
The World Cancer Research Fund carried out the largest ever inquiry into lifestyle and cancer, and issued several recommendations. They include the recommendation not to use nutrient supplements for cancer prevention since the risks/benefits ratio cannot be confidently predicted and there may be unexpected and uncommon adverse effects. Increasing the consumption of the relevant nutrients by means of the usual diet should be preferred [10].
The current fact sheet of the U.S. National Cancer Institute states as key points [11]: “Laboratory and animal research has shown antioxidants help prevent the free radical damage that is associated with cancer. However, results from recent studies in people (clinical trials) are not consistent. Antioxidants are provided by a healthy diet that includes a variety of fruits and vegetables.”
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen [12], which included 68 randomised trials with 232,606 participants (385 publications) concluded: “Treatment with beta carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E may increase mortality. The potential roles of vitamin C and selenium on mortality need further study.”
So far, no adequate randomised, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies or even meta-analyses have emerged which can shed light on the question of whether antioxidants applied in or on the skin can alter phenomena such as ageing or carcinogenesis of the skin in an unfavourable or favourable sense. We still do not know how UV, visible light and infrared or portions or combinations of these may act on modified concentrations of various antioxidants and on their components in the skin. This is a considerable challenge to the field of dermatological research. Or, to quote H. S. Black: "At present, beta-carotene use as a dietary supplement for photoprotection should be approached cautiously” [7].
|
|
References
|
| gms german medical science | The e-Journal of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany | ISSN 1612-3174 | AWMF DIMDI ZB MED DFG |